I asked for Charlie's source on his claim that Hjalmar Schacht was Jewish, and he cited Anthony Sutton's book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, and The Transfer agreement by Edwin Black, but I couldn't find any such reference in the PDF versions online.
There's the former baseball player, Al Schahct, who is about as Jewish as you can get, but, again, just because lots of Jews may have a particular last name doesn't make that person Jewish.
Charlie talks with such certainty about Hitler being a Jewish agent -- it really is amazing in itself. No room for any grey areas. If he changed his words to being pro-Bible, he'd sound exactly like the pastors he rightly chastises for being so dogmatic.
Charles cited a source that is itself discredited, however Jason as you state even that source does NOT state Schacht is a Jew, which he is not. Interestingly Schacht's daughter is today a German Attorney who represents the Estate of Joseph Goebbels and is suing Random House over the Goebbels Diaries. I hardly thing Goebbels family who have to this day refused to apologize for anything would enlist a Jew in their suit against Random House.
Charles is doing us all a service by opening up the debate into who Adolph really was,and the shadowy "actors" both behind the scenes and overtly supporting Hitler's rise to power. One has to stand back and fully understands the "Results" of those events in the 20th Century. The Jews could not have consolidated their power and influence over the developed world *without* such a prime mover being involved in creating the circumstances needed for their appropriation Of Palestine after WW2. Indeed, it is acknowledged by a few "Historians" that Hitler's Regime was responsible for pushing a large Number of Jewish people directly to Palestine even before WW2 started.
"In fact, the Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of Palestine Studies ("The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany, 1933-1941"; JPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine. This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews." - http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
The plain truth is that without a visible enemy to be made the scapegoat by the Jewish Banking and Business community across the world at the time? The Zionist Movement would never have managed to scare so many Jews into returning to the Holy lands to establish "Israel". Other World Powers could not have looked on at the outright theft of Palestinian lands without the lie of the Holocaust,and the perceived Guilt of those same world powers for not preventing it - giving the Jews Carte Blanche to steal with virtual impunity.
Attempting to defend a "Politician" for pushing his country into a Military,Political and Ideological position where it could be blamed historically is rather silly. Especially when you understand how this 20th Century Bogeyman is being used by the Jew Controlled Media and Governments to blacken the name of anyone attempting to point out the real agendas and machinations behind Jewish Plans for world hegemony. Every time someone starts defending this Little Austrian Politician because they don't like any facts interfering with their preferred fantasies,the Jews laugh and rub their hands together. yet more angst to be used against the Goy!
The Jews *want* you people to be so vocal and visible to the world. It helps them perpetuate the Milking of Whole nations consciences by using the thoroughly brainwashed and beyond saving masses out there against you.
I find it suspicious to say the least that so many are choosing this subject to bash Charlie with. But as the old saying goes:-"When you're over the target, you have to expect the thickest flak"
@foon1e, there have been no "facts" presented and no sources and in one case when a source has been requested it failed to back up Charles' claim. Your "little Austrian politician" smirk sounds just like a Weimar Jew did in 1930.
Charles is merely ranting gibberish and tin foil nonsense absent any original source backing to appeal to the lowest of the low information.
@Rodders: There's been plenty of "Facts" within his broadcasts. Just not ones you and your "Sources" agree with. That in itself doesn't make anything you posit as truthful or accurate any more reliable than Charle's statements. After all, none of us was here to live through those times. So all you have to go on is what appeals to yourself and whatever agenda you are following. Hate to break this truism to you matey,but Historians LIE - when one accepts that History is always written and rewritten by whomsoever wins out in any world-changing event. How can you or anyone else say with certainty that what you "Believe" is what really happened? You can't - no matter how loudly you bleat or whine or push your own preferred version of what you "Believe" happened. Adolf Hitler's height was 5ft 8in or 173 cm tall. Hardly what one would describe as a giant amongst 6 footers. So My reference to him as a Little Austrian Politician was both literally and geographically correct. You don't have to be Jewish to draw that conclusion. Just as I don't have to be Jewish to understand your need to belittle anyone daring to show less than "correct deference" to your Historical hero. It's just how you,and the rest of the disgruntled Posse' rolls.
It's too bad that John Friend couldn't call in yet, as I suggested him to Charlie before this week and contacted John as well, but it would be at 5 to 7 AM for him, so it's understandable that he hasn't called in.
Someone previously commented on another thread about the lack of callers. Aside from John's expertise in memorizing various Hitler quotations, it wouldn't change Charlie's opinion on the issue, and would just serve as a counterbalance for the consideration of the audience.
I will grant Charlie that he has more in his favour for arguing that Hitler was a Jewish agent and controlled opposition than he has for Martin Luther.
I find it not suspicious, but amusing, that so many people are suddenly chiming in to defend Hitler, whereas Rodney was the only one to jump to Martin Luther's defense after my post, and someone even called it a "petty criticism" when I was simply asking for more evidence for Charlie's claim that Martin Luther was a Jewish agent.
With Martin Luther, all he cited was that he was a Rosicrucian, that he wrote some over-the-top things about Jews, and that they never burned him at the stake as a heretic, etc., so it's amusing to now hear many jumping to Hitler's defense when Charlie has presented more evidence in his favour than he did for Luther, despite Luther being arguably more influential than Hitler to us today, if the Roman Catholic Church had not been split as it was because of Luther, though that was not his original intention.
Why wait for John Friend to call in at all? As Charlie is broadcasting from Rodders own network,why doesn't Rodders himself chime in on a call to defend his own cherished views? Would presumably be far easier to arrange that as a debate?
foon1e, I have talked in person to Germans who lived in the Third Reich, have you? I Know Charlie has not. Charlie has not cited a single source, he has actually cited American propaganda, i.e. fake Army "intel" that was designed to get America in the war. He also used the fact that certain American ships were not being torpedoed in the summer of 1941 as a red flag, in fact NOT a single American ship was torpedoed by German U-Boats in the summer of 1941 under direct orders from Hitler as he did not want to take FDR's bait and give him a "Lusitania". Charlie omits the Four Year Plan,as he does a lot of other facts that kills his rubbish. There seems to be excessive weed and tinfoil at Mamis. I am going to deconstruct Charlies rubbish on Deanna's Show next week. You still sound like a Weimar Jew talking about Hitler's height. They made great fun of it. I might also add Charlie says Hitler and the NSDAP didn't go after the "Big Fish" Jews, that is utter nonsense, one of the first pieces of legislation passed in 1933/34 was the removal of all Jews from Civil Service, Universities, and banning Jew Physicians from treating Germans. I suggest you and Charlie read the 1933-34 Reich Law Gazette. The German equivalent of the U.S. Congressional Record.
The jews have made Hitler out to be the biggest bogeyman in history. When you spread jew lies you are just helping the jew. All Hilter-haters are suspect to me. And why shouldn't they be?
@Jason, the post was wrong about Luther as well. There is a thing whereby loons go around keeping people in disarray and chaos and attacking real anti-Jew messengers, i.e. Luther and Hitler and others as "secret Jew Agents", this is a Jewish objective, in that people will never coalesce around an anti-Jew messenger or movement because of these fools who whisper every one and everything is a secret Jew Agent. The end result, we have no effective opposition.
Rodney, I have no need or desire to read anything that could have been fabricated within the historical record since WW2. To me, all past "official" records from most countries - including my own - are suspect. Just as is anyone who constantly pushes "History" as a means of creating a fan base which is so insular, it feeds upon itself;to the detriment of anyone trying to expose Jewry today in the real world. Constant promotion of the "Third Reich" and it's Dubious cast of characters helps no one *except* the Jews. It gives them a platform to justify their lies and falsehoods by pointing to the existence of People like yourself as the reason they have to get Governments to pass "Hate Speech" legislation,and prepare for the repression of whole populations. This is happening NOW. Not in the past. The past is nothing but a Jew distraction keeping some whose energies would be better focused on defeating our enemies today looking the wrong way.
By constantly looking backwards to Mistakes and failures from the past, you play into their greasy hands.
Or maybe that's the whole point of the words and actions of these people? Dedicated to providing exactly what those Political,Religious and Judicial Jews and their Zionist helpers need to propagate their formulas? They rely on people like you Rodders to do exactly what Hitler was set up to do:Provide the world with a credible enemy to aim at. (Much like Russia is being set up to take the fall for today by the same behind the scenes forces working for the same Jewish families and organisations responsible for the creation of both WW1 and 2.)
Oh, and for the record, I have indeed talked with a German who survived the war thanks to my Grandfather introducing me to him back in the 80's before his passing. His gracious nature and forthright viewpoints about fighting The British in the Dessert War were most enlightening to a teenager at the time. And stands in stark contrast to the murky, dubious and distracting content certain Internet "Personalities" provide today as a distraction to what is being done to all Non-Jews here "In The Now". The reason there's no effective opposition is because of distraction merchants pushing ancient history instead of the political reality affecting us all today. Droning on about the injustices of the past is wasted effort.
@foon1e: find me a single German who was mature during the Third Reich who supports Charles "narrative". By the way, love your Soviet style censorship, i.e. deleting uncomfortable comments. There is a problem with fools who say everyone and everything are Jew Agents, that assures there is NO organized opposition to organized Jewry and does the the Jew's work. The last effective organized opposition to world Jewry was led by Hitler and the Third Reich and we saw Jewish Communism and Jewish capitalism unite to destroy it, beginning in 1933. Stalin offered (to England and France) to invade in 1938. Stalin later signed the non aggression pact because he deemed the West as indecisive. I did not hear Charles mention this.
When is this fool, CG, going to give up? He parrots utter Jewish nonsense. Hitler JAILED A ROTHSCHILD for HEAVEN'S SAKE!! Kicked out the Jewish sleaze bags, otherwise known as the Kosher Nostra, which ushered in the war in the first place. If Hitler WAS a Jewish agent, there would have been NO need for war. Human WHITE CHRISTIAN sacrifices are another thing, I suspect, but Hitler was a loyal Aryan who hated spilling even English blood.
None of this shit makes sense, none whatsoever, and most if not all of it can be easily deconstructed. The same THING is happening today FFS!!: JEWISH HEGEMONY, JEWISH TALMUDISM has now got Russia and Iran in its sights, have utterly obliterated Gaza and Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, with Syria and Yemen close behind.
The Saudis, the Wahhabis, who are actually JEWISH, play ball with the Zionists because they are Zionists themselves. To smear Hitler with the same brush can only be the ploy of a Jewish agent, or a complete idiot.
"The Jews could not have consolidated their power and influence over the developed world *without* such a prime mover being involved in creating the circumstances needed for their appropriation Of Palestine after WW2"
The Jews had to fight a war. They won it with the help of the fools that served them.
foon1e, very funny, but I have not had to go to Hamburg rest homes. I have gone to individual homes and recorded oral histories. Yes, they were citizens of the Third Reich and NONE of them have ever stated they regret supporting Hitler, have all said it was the greatest time in their lives and in the life of what was once Germany and NONE support the silly narrative that Hitler was an agent of Jewry. Quite the opposite, they all say Hitler ended Jewish dominance over German Institutions.
Thanks Rodney. I was thinking the same thing about Foon1e's comments. No use in anyone fighting the Jews as we will all be called Jewish agents.
I'd like to know how one plans on exposing the Jew today without history.
Oh no, don't bring up Hitler, the 3rd Reich or else the Jews will have hate speech laws passed???? Seriously? From what I've seen they don't need to rely on only that to dream up reasons for hate speech laws. You actually think the Jews will stop trying to censor the gentiles if we all shut up about the 3rd Reich? Man, are you smoking some thing powerful.
By the way Charlie used to bash Hitler a lot, then he changed after listening to and interviewing several historians, now it seems he back to his old self. What changed CG? Foon1e?
Well 1776, In my case? Not much. I've always held and professed the viewpoint that associating any modern day attempt to "Out" the machinations and Schemes of the Jews and their Christian Zionist helpers is crippled from the start whenever someone starts bringing up Hitler and WW2. You are attempting to rewrite over 70 years of full-on propaganda now accepted by the majority of Humanity as essentially "The Truth". And it's an impossible task. It Provides Jews with their visible target to further demonise good people with. And also serves to take modern day truth seekers eyes off the ball by wasting time arguing and whinging about what *was* - rather than what now *IS*.
The past is dead and gone. You're never going to get the chance to change it in our lifetime. The only thing we can change is the rest of humanities opinion of Judaism as it's influence is felt and experienced by people today. And that means exposing their behaviour in ways that large swaths of the populations of the West can relate to. (without being tarred and feathered by opinions already bred into whole generations, and maintained by modern mainstream media and academia).
You can't "win" today by associating yourself with the failed History of the 20th century. All you do there is set yourself up for censure and failure of your own credibility. And generate small pools of likeminded obsessives who are content with ruling/running their own little intellectual fiefdoms and gratifying their own egos.
I hope you can understand *some* of the logic in my position here. Because unlike those hell bent on dragging the fight against the Jews today back into a murky past already lost, Throwing away all that Germanic baggage in favour of concentrating on whats actually occurring today is the only thing i can see having any slight chance of success against those embedded parasites on today's body Politic.
Also, regarding the introduction almost worldwide of Jewish sponsored "Anti-Hate Speech" laws? I direct your attention to this legal body currently heavily involved in that process. (http://www.legal-project.org/issues/european-hate-speech-laws) Their agenda is clearly spelt out on their website - along with numerous examples of how this spreading cancer against freedom of thought and speech is being propagated in Europe. There's also other examples out there of similar processes currently ongoing in America and especially Canada too. I suggest rather than Poo-Pooing their current attempts to stifle justifiable criticism of all Jewish Influence, you read up on how this UN supported viewpoint is going to directly affect you in whatever country you currently reside within.
It seems like someone isn't able to accept the fact that England was on the wrong side of WW1 and WW2. If you want the truth on your side, you will first need to accept the truth.
I recall that Davy Crockett, James Bowie, et. al. LOST at the Alamo, but, in their sacrifice, inflicted such heavy damage to the invading army that their comrades (Sam Houston, et. al.) were able to win later. Although Hitler's 3rd Reich LOST to the jews and their hordes of soviets, they inflicted such a heavy loss that the soviet plans to sovietize ALL of Europe could never be realized and they had to settle for occupying eastern Europe for a few miserable decades.
It wasn't long after the fall of Berlin that the western powers realized that they had "killed the wrong pig" (Churchill), and that the Germans were "far superior" (Patton). If these giants came to that conclusion pretty quickly after the fighting was over, why do some here have such a hard time coming to the same conclusion.
Just because a magician (or tribe of magicians) got away with fooling the masses for several decades doesn't mean those of us who see the "trick" shouldn't press hard exposing it - actually, the tricksters have gone so far out on a limb (holohoax, et al) that should this exposure ever get even a teeny footing with a substantial percentage of the masses, these magicians could be ruined for generations to come, credibility-wise. Once a person realizes what a BIG LIE that holohoax was and how it fooled millions for decades, then he won't be willing to believe a damn thing any jew (or a jew lackey or cooperative) says for ever more.
Press on, truth seekers, the TRUTH sooner or later serves as the deep penetrating spears right into the heart of the tricksters, and that will carry the day in the end.
@ProGoyim, the U.S. was on the wrong side as well and actually steered England in 1939 and Poland into war. Had FDR kept his nose out of Europe, particularly not told Poland they would be reinforced, the Poles and Germans would have made a deal over Danzig. In the end, FDR lied, got England to make a guarantee to Poland Re: Germany, BUT NOT against the Soviet invasion of Poland and the rest is history. FDR got his war with Germany and also took down the British Empire as well.
Charlie does not understand the difference between an intelligence agent and an intelligence asset.
The agent consciously knows he is a spy, and either gathers information or feeds bad advice, etc.
It takes skilled profiling to turn an enemy into an asset, such that reactions to various 'hot button' issues are known in advance with a relatively high degree of accuracy.
Hitler was successfully profiled by the kikejews and their minions, but was certainly not an agent.
Adolf Hitler was obviously loyal to Germany through to the end!
My comment was directed to foon1e who is British. Yes, I think it goes without saying that if England was on the wrong side of the wars - so was America, Russia, etc. I just wanted to point out that sometimes ones own perspective is skewed because of their own allegiance to their country. I hope this is the case.
@progoyim: I don't accept that there were *ANY* sides that mattered back then except for the sides of *Real* Humanity Versus Judaism. False "Patriotism" was always the tool the Jews and their Christian Zionist Facilitators have used to control Humanity since the days of the Roman Empire. Their ability to convince naive Non Jews to adopt Heirachical systems of Governance under the "Rule of Law" - most of which they either wrote for us under the guise of "Christianity" and the Biblical texts. Or Enforced by Controlling the Treasuries,Monetary systems and social policies of countries they then pitted against each other (Which is why so much of Modern Day Politics and Government resembles that of the systems Rome created and lived under).
Now Progoyim, I appreciate you and those similarly like-minded individuals who visit Mami's daily seem to be awake to the dangers posed to us all by the Historical and present day Jewish schemes and plans for eventual total World Domination under *their* rules. Yet your continued attempts to claim the moral High-Ground while defending those directly under the sway of the Jew is perplexing to me. Seeing as *ALL* the nation-States involved in fighting both WW1 and 2 were either directly or indirectly under the control of Jewish actors, to say that one Country or people was "Blameless" in what eventually transpired between them all is nonsense.
One of my personal Historical Heroes was Metternich - an Austrian! And his most famous quote still applies to this day in my opinion:- "Patriotism is the last refuge Of The Scoundrel". He was dead-on.
This is precisely why I reject the worldview of anyone who appears determined to base their own interpretation of *which* truth is important to push to those still blinkered by Historical and Geographical allegiances.
Ultimately, all that really matters in life is the safety and well-being of your own families and Friends. Anything else outside those structures exist only to benefit the Ambitious;the Greedy;the Tribal;and the Jew.
For a person that is waiting until the shit hits the fan you sure do a lot........
why is anthony sutton still a credible source???
let me correct you further: in ww1 there was one country not fully under the jews control and that was russia, the tsar had started expelling jews since 1880 and jews were resentfull, so much so that they tried to push the 6 million holohoax then and blame it on the tsar. the tsar and his family who they murdered.
Your tactics of demoralisation are pretty obvious: its the eric hufschmid/hufshit tactic: call everyone a jew and bad so no one does anything. again why go to such lenghts to try to demoralise people and discredit real opposition to the jewish world order if you are just waiting until the shit hits the fan???
DBS (daryl bradford smith) has been waiting for that since 2006 lol
33 comments:
Great series charles
I asked for Charlie's source on his claim that Hjalmar Schacht was Jewish, and he cited Anthony Sutton's book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, and The Transfer agreement by Edwin Black, but I couldn't find any such reference in the PDF versions online.
There's the former baseball player, Al Schahct, who is about as Jewish as you can get, but, again, just because lots of Jews may have a particular last name doesn't make that person Jewish.
Charlie talks with such certainty about Hitler being a Jewish agent -- it really is amazing in itself. No room for any grey areas. If he changed his words to being pro-Bible, he'd sound exactly like the pastors he rightly chastises for being so dogmatic.
Charles cited a source that is itself discredited, however Jason as you state even that source does NOT state Schacht is a Jew, which he is not. Interestingly Schacht's daughter is today a German Attorney who represents the Estate of Joseph Goebbels and is suing Random House over the Goebbels Diaries. I hardly thing Goebbels family who have to this day refused to apologize for anything would enlist a Jew in their suit against Random House.
Charles is doing us all a service by opening up the debate into who Adolph really was,and the shadowy "actors" both behind the scenes and overtly supporting Hitler's rise to power.
One has to stand back and fully understands the "Results" of those events in the 20th Century.
The Jews could not have consolidated their power and influence over the developed world *without* such a prime mover being involved in creating the circumstances needed for their appropriation Of Palestine after WW2.
Indeed, it is acknowledged by a few "Historians" that Hitler's Regime was responsible for pushing a large Number of Jewish people directly to Palestine even before WW2 started.
"In fact, the Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of Palestine Studies ("The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany, 1933-1941"; JPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine. This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews." - http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
The plain truth is that without a visible enemy to be made the scapegoat by the Jewish Banking and Business community across the world at the time? The Zionist Movement would never have managed to scare so many Jews into returning to the Holy lands to establish "Israel". Other World Powers could not have looked on at the outright theft of Palestinian lands without the lie of the Holocaust,and the perceived Guilt of those same world powers for not preventing it - giving the Jews Carte Blanche to steal with virtual impunity.
Attempting to defend a "Politician" for pushing his country into a Military,Political and Ideological position where it could be blamed historically is rather silly. Especially when you understand how this 20th Century Bogeyman is being used by the Jew Controlled Media and Governments to blacken the name of anyone attempting to point out the real agendas and machinations behind Jewish Plans for world hegemony.
Every time someone starts defending this Little Austrian Politician because they don't like any facts interfering with their preferred fantasies,the Jews laugh and rub their hands together. yet more angst to be used against the Goy!
The Jews *want* you people to be so vocal and visible to the world. It helps them perpetuate the Milking of Whole nations consciences by using the thoroughly brainwashed and beyond saving masses out there against you.
I find it suspicious to say the least that so many are choosing this subject to bash Charlie with. But as the old saying goes:-"When you're over the target, you have to expect the thickest flak"
@foon1e, there have been no "facts" presented and no sources and in one case when a source has been requested it failed to back up Charles' claim. Your "little Austrian politician" smirk sounds just like a Weimar Jew did in 1930.
Charles is merely ranting gibberish and tin foil nonsense absent any original source backing to appeal to the lowest of the low information.
@Rodders: There's been plenty of "Facts" within his broadcasts. Just not ones you and your "Sources" agree with. That in itself doesn't make anything you posit as truthful or accurate any more reliable than Charle's statements. After all, none of us was here to live through those times. So all you have to go on is what appeals to yourself and whatever agenda you are following.
Hate to break this truism to you matey,but Historians LIE - when one accepts that History is always written and rewritten by whomsoever wins out in any world-changing event. How can you or anyone else say with certainty that what you "Believe" is what really happened? You can't - no matter how loudly you bleat or whine or push your own preferred version of what you "Believe" happened.
Adolf Hitler's height was 5ft 8in or 173 cm tall. Hardly what one would describe as a giant amongst 6 footers. So My reference to him as a Little Austrian Politician was both literally and geographically correct. You don't have to be Jewish to draw that conclusion. Just as I don't have to be Jewish to understand your need to belittle anyone daring to show less than "correct deference" to your Historical hero. It's just how you,and the rest of the disgruntled Posse' rolls.
It's too bad that John Friend couldn't call in yet, as I suggested him to Charlie before this week and contacted John as well, but it would be at 5 to 7 AM for him, so it's understandable that he hasn't called in.
Someone previously commented on another thread about the lack of callers. Aside from John's expertise in memorizing various Hitler quotations, it wouldn't change Charlie's opinion on the issue, and would just serve as a counterbalance for the consideration of the audience.
I will grant Charlie that he has more in his favour for arguing that Hitler was a Jewish agent and controlled opposition than he has for Martin Luther.
I find it not suspicious, but amusing, that so many people are suddenly chiming in to defend Hitler, whereas Rodney was the only one to jump to Martin Luther's defense after my post, and someone even called it a "petty criticism" when I was simply asking for more evidence for Charlie's claim that Martin Luther was a Jewish agent.
With Martin Luther, all he cited was that he was a Rosicrucian, that he wrote some over-the-top things about Jews, and that they never burned him at the stake as a heretic, etc., so it's amusing to now hear many jumping to Hitler's defense when Charlie has presented more evidence in his favour than he did for Luther, despite Luther being arguably more influential than Hitler to us today, if the Roman Catholic Church had not been split as it was because of Luther, though that was not his original intention.
Why wait for John Friend to call in at all? As Charlie is broadcasting from Rodders own network,why doesn't Rodders himself chime in on a call to defend his own cherished views? Would presumably be far easier to arrange that as a debate?
foon1e, I have talked in person to Germans who lived in the Third Reich, have you? I Know Charlie has not. Charlie has not cited a single source, he has actually cited American propaganda, i.e. fake Army "intel" that was designed to get America in the war. He also used the fact that certain American ships were not being torpedoed in the summer of 1941 as a red flag, in fact NOT a single American ship was torpedoed by German U-Boats in the summer of 1941 under direct orders from Hitler as he did not want to take FDR's bait and give him a "Lusitania". Charlie omits the Four Year Plan,as he does a lot of other facts that kills his rubbish. There seems to be excessive weed and tinfoil at Mamis. I am going to deconstruct Charlies rubbish on Deanna's Show next week. You still sound like a Weimar Jew talking about Hitler's height. They made great fun of it. I might also add Charlie says Hitler and the NSDAP didn't go after the "Big Fish" Jews, that is utter nonsense, one of the first pieces of legislation passed in 1933/34 was the removal of all Jews from Civil Service, Universities, and banning Jew Physicians from treating Germans. I suggest you and Charlie read the 1933-34 Reich Law Gazette. The German equivalent of the U.S. Congressional Record.
The jews have made Hitler out to be the biggest bogeyman in history. When you spread jew lies you are just helping the jew. All Hilter-haters are suspect to me. And why shouldn't they be?
@Jason, the post was wrong about Luther as well. There is a thing whereby loons go around keeping people in disarray and chaos and attacking real anti-Jew messengers, i.e. Luther and Hitler and others as "secret Jew Agents", this is a Jewish objective, in that people will never coalesce around an anti-Jew messenger or movement because of these fools who whisper every one and everything is a secret Jew Agent. The end result, we have no effective opposition.
Giuliani kicks Azz!
These shows are the best of the best..
Never really got that Hitler thing??
Will be waiting for Giuliani Condemnation shows,, soon..
Best would be a round table with Giuliani & the not so Happy.
I would pay for that show!
Rodney, I have no need or desire to read anything that could have been fabricated within the historical record since WW2. To me, all past "official" records from most countries - including my own - are suspect.
Just as is anyone who constantly pushes "History" as a means of creating a fan base which is so insular, it feeds upon itself;to the detriment of anyone trying to expose Jewry today in the real world.
Constant promotion of the "Third Reich" and it's Dubious cast of characters helps no one *except* the Jews. It gives them a platform to justify their lies and falsehoods by pointing to the existence of People like yourself as the reason they have to get Governments to pass "Hate Speech" legislation,and prepare for the repression of whole populations.
This is happening NOW. Not in the past. The past is nothing but a Jew distraction keeping some whose energies would be better focused on defeating our enemies today looking the wrong way.
By constantly looking backwards to Mistakes and failures from the past, you play into their greasy hands.
Or maybe that's the whole point of the words and actions of these people? Dedicated to providing exactly what those Political,Religious and Judicial Jews and their Zionist helpers need to propagate their formulas? They rely on people like you Rodders to do exactly what Hitler was set up to do:Provide the world with a credible enemy to aim at.
(Much like Russia is being set up to take the fall for today by the same behind the scenes forces working for the same Jewish families and organisations responsible for the creation of both WW1 and 2.)
Oh, and for the record, I have indeed talked with a German who survived the war thanks to my Grandfather introducing me to him back in the 80's before his passing. His gracious nature and forthright viewpoints about fighting The British in the Dessert War were most enlightening to a teenager at the time.
And stands in stark contrast to the murky, dubious and distracting content certain Internet "Personalities" provide today as a distraction to what is being done to all Non-Jews here "In The Now".
The reason there's no effective opposition is because of distraction merchants pushing ancient history instead of the political reality affecting us all today. Droning on about the injustices of the past is wasted effort.
@foon1e: find me a single German who was mature during the Third Reich who supports Charles "narrative". By the way, love your Soviet style censorship, i.e. deleting uncomfortable comments. There is a problem with fools who say everyone and everything are Jew Agents, that assures there is NO organized opposition to organized Jewry and does the the Jew's work. The last effective organized opposition to world Jewry was led by Hitler and the Third Reich and we saw Jewish Communism and Jewish capitalism unite to destroy it, beginning in 1933. Stalin offered (to England and France) to invade in 1938. Stalin later signed the non aggression pact because he deemed the West as indecisive. I did not hear Charles mention this.
BTW- I have talked to a LOT of Third Reich Citizens, NONE support Charles nonsense.
Well Rodney. I am impressed...that the Old Folks Home In Hamburg let you stay on the phone to their residents for that long! ;)
Third Reich "Citizens" must be on the same elixier of life as all the hollocoat survivers , lol
When is this fool, CG, going to give up? He parrots utter Jewish nonsense. Hitler JAILED A ROTHSCHILD for HEAVEN'S SAKE!! Kicked out the Jewish sleaze bags, otherwise known as the Kosher Nostra, which ushered in the war in the first place. If Hitler WAS a Jewish agent, there would have been NO need for war. Human WHITE CHRISTIAN sacrifices are another thing, I suspect, but Hitler was a loyal Aryan who hated spilling even English blood.
None of this shit makes sense, none whatsoever, and most if not all of it can be easily deconstructed. The same THING is happening today FFS!!: JEWISH HEGEMONY, JEWISH TALMUDISM has now got Russia and Iran in its sights, have utterly obliterated Gaza and Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, with Syria and Yemen close behind.
The Saudis, the Wahhabis, who are actually JEWISH, play ball with the Zionists because they are Zionists themselves. To smear Hitler with the same brush can only be the ploy of a Jewish agent, or a complete idiot.
With CG, it's impossible to know which.
"The Jews could not have consolidated their power and influence over the developed world *without* such a prime mover being involved in creating the circumstances needed for their appropriation Of Palestine after WW2"
The Jews had to fight a war. They won it with the help of the fools that served them.
foon1e, very funny, but I have not had to go to Hamburg rest homes. I have gone to individual homes and recorded oral histories. Yes, they were citizens of the Third Reich and NONE of them have ever stated they regret supporting Hitler, have all said it was the greatest time in their lives and in the life of what was once Germany and NONE support the silly narrative that Hitler was an agent of Jewry. Quite the opposite, they all say Hitler ended Jewish dominance over German Institutions.
Thanks Rodney. I was thinking the same thing about Foon1e's comments. No use in anyone fighting the Jews as we will all be called Jewish agents.
I'd like to know how one plans on exposing the Jew today without history.
Oh no, don't bring up Hitler, the 3rd Reich or else the Jews will have hate speech laws passed???? Seriously? From what I've seen they don't need to rely on only that to dream up reasons for hate speech laws. You actually think the Jews will stop trying to censor the gentiles if we all shut up about the 3rd Reich? Man, are you smoking some thing powerful.
By the way Charlie used to bash Hitler a lot, then he changed after listening to and interviewing several historians, now it seems he back to his old self. What changed CG? Foon1e?
Well 1776, In my case? Not much. I've always held and professed the viewpoint that associating any modern day attempt to "Out" the machinations and Schemes of the Jews and their Christian Zionist helpers is crippled from the start whenever someone starts bringing up Hitler and WW2.
You are attempting to rewrite over 70 years of full-on propaganda now accepted by the majority of Humanity as essentially "The Truth". And it's an impossible task. It Provides Jews with their visible target to further demonise good people with.
And also serves to take modern day truth seekers eyes off the ball by wasting time arguing and whinging about what *was* - rather than what now *IS*.
The past is dead and gone. You're never going to get the chance to change it in our lifetime. The only thing we can change is the rest of humanities opinion of Judaism as it's influence is felt and experienced by people today. And that means exposing their behaviour in ways that large swaths of the populations of the West can relate to. (without being tarred and feathered by opinions already bred into whole generations, and maintained by modern mainstream media and academia).
You can't "win" today by associating yourself with the failed History of the 20th century. All you do there is set yourself up for censure and failure of your own credibility. And generate small pools of likeminded obsessives who are content with ruling/running their own little intellectual fiefdoms and gratifying their own egos.
I hope you can understand *some* of the logic in my position here. Because unlike those hell bent on dragging the fight against the Jews today back into a murky past already lost, Throwing away all that Germanic baggage in favour of concentrating on whats actually occurring today is the only thing i can see having any slight chance of success against those embedded parasites on today's body Politic.
Also, regarding the introduction almost worldwide of Jewish sponsored "Anti-Hate Speech" laws? I direct your attention to this legal body currently heavily involved in that process. (http://www.legal-project.org/issues/european-hate-speech-laws)
Their agenda is clearly spelt out on their website - along with numerous examples of how this spreading cancer against freedom of thought and speech is being propagated in Europe. There's also other examples out there of similar processes currently ongoing in America and especially Canada too. I suggest rather than Poo-Pooing their current attempts to stifle justifiable criticism of all Jewish Influence, you read up on how this UN supported viewpoint is going to directly affect you in whatever country you currently reside within.
It seems like someone isn't able to accept the fact that England was on the wrong side of WW1 and WW2. If you want the truth on your side, you will first need to accept the truth.
I recall that Davy Crockett, James Bowie, et. al. LOST at the Alamo, but, in their sacrifice, inflicted such heavy damage to the invading army that their comrades (Sam Houston, et. al.) were able to win later. Although Hitler's 3rd Reich LOST to the jews and their hordes of soviets, they inflicted such a heavy loss that the soviet plans to sovietize ALL of Europe could never be realized and they had to settle for occupying eastern Europe for a few miserable decades.
It wasn't long after the fall of Berlin that the western powers realized that they had "killed the wrong pig" (Churchill), and that the Germans were "far superior" (Patton). If these giants came to that conclusion pretty quickly after the fighting was over, why do some here have such a hard time coming to the same conclusion.
Just because a magician (or tribe of magicians) got away with fooling the masses for several decades doesn't mean those of us who see the "trick" shouldn't press hard exposing it - actually, the tricksters have gone so far out on a limb (holohoax, et al) that should this exposure ever get even a teeny footing with a substantial percentage of the masses, these magicians could be ruined for generations to come, credibility-wise. Once a person realizes what a BIG LIE that holohoax was and how it fooled millions for decades, then he won't be willing to believe a damn thing any jew (or a jew lackey or cooperative) says for ever more.
Press on, truth seekers, the TRUTH sooner or later serves as the deep penetrating spears right into the heart of the tricksters, and that will carry the day in the end.
@ProGoyim, the U.S. was on the wrong side as well and actually steered England in 1939 and Poland into war. Had FDR kept his nose out of Europe, particularly not told Poland they would be reinforced, the Poles and Germans would have made a deal over Danzig. In the end, FDR lied, got England to make a guarantee to Poland Re: Germany, BUT NOT against the Soviet invasion of Poland and the rest is history. FDR got his war with Germany and also took down the British Empire as well.
Charlie does not understand the difference between an intelligence agent and an intelligence asset.
The agent consciously knows he is a spy, and either gathers information or feeds bad advice, etc.
It takes skilled profiling to turn an enemy into an asset, such that reactions to various 'hot button' issues are known in advance with a relatively high degree of accuracy.
Hitler was successfully profiled by the kikejews and their minions, but was certainly not an agent.
Adolf Hitler was obviously loyal to Germany through to the end!
Hey Zapoper, where is CG's show for today? Thanks!
Rodney,
My comment was directed to foon1e who is British. Yes, I think it goes without saying that if England was on the wrong side of the wars - so was America, Russia, etc. I just wanted to point out that sometimes ones own perspective is skewed because of their own allegiance to their country. I hope this is the case.
@progoyim: I don't accept that there were *ANY* sides that mattered back then except for the sides of *Real* Humanity Versus Judaism.
False "Patriotism" was always the tool the Jews and their Christian Zionist Facilitators have used to control Humanity since the days of the Roman Empire. Their ability to convince naive Non Jews to adopt Heirachical systems of Governance under the "Rule of Law" - most of which they either wrote for us under the guise of "Christianity" and the Biblical texts. Or Enforced by Controlling the Treasuries,Monetary systems and social policies of countries they then pitted against each other
(Which is why so much of Modern Day Politics and Government resembles that of the systems Rome created and lived under).
Now Progoyim, I appreciate you and those similarly like-minded individuals who visit Mami's daily seem to be awake to the dangers posed to us all by the Historical and present day Jewish schemes and plans for eventual total World Domination under *their* rules. Yet your continued attempts to claim the moral High-Ground while defending those directly under the sway of the Jew is perplexing to me. Seeing as *ALL* the nation-States involved in fighting both WW1 and 2 were either directly or indirectly under the control of Jewish actors, to say that one Country or people was "Blameless" in what eventually transpired between them all is nonsense.
One of my personal Historical Heroes was Metternich - an Austrian! And his most famous quote still applies to this day in my opinion:- "Patriotism is the last refuge Of The Scoundrel".
He was dead-on.
This is precisely why I reject the worldview of anyone who appears determined to base their own interpretation of *which* truth is important to push to those still blinkered by Historical and Geographical allegiances.
Ultimately, all that really matters in life is the safety and well-being of your own families and Friends.
Anything else outside those structures exist only to benefit the Ambitious;the Greedy;the Tribal;and the Jew.
For a person that is waiting until the shit hits the fan you sure do a lot........
why is anthony sutton still a credible source???
let me correct you further: in ww1 there was one country not fully under the jews control and that was russia, the tsar had started expelling jews since 1880 and jews were resentfull, so much so that they tried to push the 6 million holohoax then and blame it on the tsar. the tsar and his family who they murdered.
Your tactics of demoralisation are pretty obvious: its the eric hufschmid/hufshit tactic: call everyone a jew and bad so no one does anything. again why go to such lenghts to try to demoralise people and discredit real opposition to the jewish world order if you are just waiting until the shit hits the fan???
DBS (daryl bradford smith) has been waiting for that since 2006 lol
Post a Comment